• anna j. clutterbuck-cook
  • contact
  • curriculum vitae
  • find me elsewhere
  • marilyn ross memorial book prize

the feminist librarian

the feminist librarian

Category Archives: book reviews

#QueerJoyGiveaway Explainer Post

25 Saturday Jul 2020

Posted by Anna Clutterbuck-Cook in book reviews

≈ Leave a comment

On Hiatus in 2022.

Due to my ongoing treatment for cancer since March 2021, I’ve had to relearn the new limits of my energy. I’ve suspended a number of side projects, and although I tried to restart the Queer Joy Giveaway back in the fall it became clear that I just didn’t have enough reliable energy to select titles, post weekly on Saturdays, and keep up with fufilling title requests. Therefore, I’m putting this giveaway on hiatus through 2022. I hope to pick it back up in some form in 2023. Thank you for understanding! ~Anna

Queer Joy Giveaway Explainer

On the first Saturday after Massachusetts declared a state of emergency due to COVID-19, in March 2020, I decided to give away twenty-five copies of R. Cooper’s A Little Familiar novella as a way to bring good cheer to people struggling with isolation admidst social distancing and stay-at-home directives.

Original Twitter thread here.

The giveaway has since turned into a weekly event as weeks have turned into months and we’re probably looking at a year and more of some measure of social distancing, quarantine, stress, and exhaustion.

How it Works

The giveaway guidelines are simple:

  • Each Saturday, I post the weekly title on Twitter with the number of copies available (generally ~$25 worth has been my budget).
  • Copies are given out on a first come, first served basis to those who request a title via the request form. 
  • Readers are limited to ONE title per week, but may make a request each week with no limit. 
  • The default mode of delivery is Kindle e-book delivered as a gift via Amazon; if a reader doesn’t use the Kindle platform we work out an alternate method of delivery (I have learned a lot about how hard some platforms make it for you to buy e-books as a gift over the past four months!).

As long as our household finances can support this effort, I plan to continue this project. It’s a win-win-win as far as I’m concerned since I get to put books I love into the hands of readers, signal boosting talented creators and spreading rainbow sparkle happily ever after joy at a time when a lot of us need to be dreaming of queer futures filled with hope rather than despair.

I want to be clear, too, that this is a personal project. No publishers or authors are paying me or supplying these books in exchange for free advertising. These titles are all books I have personally read and loved, by authors whose entire body of work I encourage you to explore — most of them are wonderfully prolific and deserve all the sales! When I make my weekly selections I’m working to be mix it up in terms of relationship types and other kinds of marginalized identity rep — but I’m also sharing my faves so this list definitely skews historical, paranormal, and queer. Super not apologizing for that.

Co-sponsors: If you’re interested in sponsoring copies of upcoming titles, shoot me an email at feministlibrarian@gmail.com. I would be happy to be able to increase the number of copies of certain works, particularly since authors from under-represented communities often cannot afford to sell titles for really low cover prices — meaning I’m left to offer fewer of those works within my budget. Sponsors who donate $25 or more to the project get 1) a shout-out, 2) a copy of their choice of any title I have previously offered and 3) a copy of the title they sponsor.

The Titles

2020

March 14: A Little Familiar (Familiar Spirits #1)* by R. Cooper.

March 21: A Little Light Mischief (The Turner Series, #3.5) by Cat Sebastian.

March 28: Widdershins (Whyborne & Griffin #1) by Jordan L. Hawk.

April 4: The Craft of Love by E. E. Ottoman.

April 11: Let Us Dream by Alyssa Cole.

April 18: A Lady’s Desire (The Townsends #2.5) by Lily Maxton.

April 25: Behind These Doors (Radical Proposals #1) by Jude Lucens.

May 2: Mrs. Martin’s Incomparable Adventure (The Worth Saga #2.75) by Courtney Milan.

May 9: Salt Magic, Skin Magic by Lee Welch.

May 16: Briarley Aster Glenn Gray.

May 23: Untamed by Anna Cowan.

May 30: Once Upon a Haunted Moor (Tyack & Frayne #1) by Harper Fox.

June 6 & 13: Hamilton’s Battalion: A Trio of Romances by Alyssa Cole, Rose Lerner, and Courtney Milan.

June 20: Once Ghosted, Twice Shy (Reluctant Royals #2.5) by Alyssa Cole.

June 27: Holly & Oak (Familiar Spirits #2) by R. Cooper.

July 4: Lord of the Last Heartbeat (The Sacred Dark #1) by May Peterson.

July 11: Spellbound (Magic in Manhattan #1) by Allie Therin.

July 18: Starcrossed (Magic in Manhattan #2) by Allie Therin.

July 25: Lord of the Last Heartbeat (The Sacred Dark #1) by May Peterson.
Co-sponsored by Stephanie Richmond

August 1: The Lady’s Guide to Celestial Mechanics (Feminine Pursuits #1) by Olivia Waite.

August 8: Waiting for the Flood (Spires #2) by Alexis Hall.

August 15: He’s Come Undone: A Romance Anthology by Emma Barry, Olivia Dade, Adriana Herrera, Ruby Lang, and Cat Sebastian.
Co-sponsored by hazmatilda

August 22: The Mage on the Hill (Web of Arcana #1) by Angel Martinez.
Co-sponsored by Stephanie Richmond

August 29: Hexbreaker (Hexworld #1) by Jordan L. Hawk.
Co-sponsored by Lauren Leslie

September 5: Edge of Nowhere (Nowhere #1) by Felicia Davin.
Co-sponsored by Anoymous donor 

September 12: Proper English (England #2) by K.J. Charles.
Co-sponsored by Anoymous donor

September 19 & 26: Small Change (Small Change #1) by Roan Parrish.

October 3rd: The Mysterious & Amazing Blue Billings (Black & Blue #1) by Lily Morton. 

October 10th: Undertow (Widdershins #8.5) by Jordan L. Hawk. 
Co-sponsored by Anonymous donor

October 17th: Nine Years of Silver (Love Has Claws #1) by Parker Foye.

~ gap week 10/24 ~

October 31st: Best Laid Plaids (Kilty Pleasures #1) by Ella Stainton &
Nothing More Certain (Familiar Spirits #3) by R. Cooper.
Co-sponsored by PSMH and Ella Stainton.

November 3: A Little Familiar (Familiar Spirits #1) by R. Cooper.

November 7: Reverb (Twisted Wishes #3) by Anna Zabo.
Co-sponsored by Kayci Wyatt

November 14: Hold Me (Cyclone #2) by Courtney Milan.

November 21: Immortal City (Sacred Dark #2) by May Peterson.  

November 28: The Doctor’s Discretion by E.E. Ottoman. 

December 5: Iron & Velvet (Kate Kane, Paranormal Investigator #1) by Alexis Hall. 

December 12: Corruption (The Bureau #1) by Kim Fielding.

December 19: Caroled (The Bureau #7) by Kim Fielding. 

December 26: The Remaking of Corbin Wale by Roan Parrish.

2021

January 2: Tit for Tat by R. Cooper. 

January 9: Eating Stars by Angel Martinez. 

January 16: Frostbite by J. Emery. 

January 23: The Engineer (Magic & Steam #1) by C.S. Poe. 
Co-sponsored by Anonymous.

January 30: Unhallowed (Rath & Rune #1) by Jordan L. Hawk
Co-sponsored by Anonymous.

~ gap week 2/6 ~

February 13th: Magic in Manhatten #1-3 by Allie Therin.

February 20th: Shortbread and Shadows (Hedge Witches Lonely Hearts Club #1) by Amy Lane.

~ medical leave hiatus ~

June 12th: Blind Tiger (The Pride #1) by Jordan L. Hawk. 

June 19th: Hither, Page (Page & Sommers #1) by Cat Sebastian. 

June 26th: Foxen Bloom by Parker Foye. 

July 3rd: The Faerie Hounds of New York by Arden Powell. 

July 10th: A Beginner’s Guide to Wooing Your Mate (Beings in Love #3) by R. Cooper. 

July 17th & 24th: His Secret Illuminations (The Warrior’s Guild #1) by Scarlett Gale. 

July 31st: In the Middle of Somewhere (Middle of Somewhere #1) by Roan Parrish.

August 7th: Unhallowed(Rath & Rune #1) by Jordan L. Hawk.

August 14th, 21st, 28th & September 4th: Warehouse Sale! Choose from backlist titles here. 

*A number of these are part of a series, but if they aren’t the first books in the series I’ve been careful to select titles that may be read as standalones.

Book Review: Algorithms of Oppression

23 Wednesday Jan 2019

Posted by Anna Clutterbuck-Cook in book reviews, library life

≈ Leave a comment

Since we’re talking about the racism built into algorithms this morning, I thought I could share this review I wrote for the NEA Newsletter (January 2019). The published review had to be revised down to 500 words; this is the extended version. 

34762552Noble, Safiya Umoja. Algorithms of Oppression: How Search Engines Reinforce Racism (New York University Press, 2018).

In this accessible and deeply-researched volume, critical information studies scholar Safiya Noble (University of California, Los Angeles; co-editor of The Intersectional Internet) uses the Google search engine as case study to document and theorize the ways in which racism and sexism are embedded within the structures of information harvest and delivery by for-profit companies on the World Wide Web. Noble considers the mechanisms through which results are delivered to those who use Google search, foregrounds the power relationships that shape the nature and hierarchy of those results, and challenges readers to denaturalize the process of “Googling it” when we have a question in need of a ready and reliable answer. As a sociologist and a critical library and information science scholar, Noble weaves together a librarian’s understanding of how cataloging, classification, and research tools operate with a critical Black feminist understanding of the interlocking systems of oppression from within which these technological systems of information organization and retrieval were designed. Often assumed by both developers and the general public to be value-neutral, the typically invisible (and often proprietary) algorithms by which human beings create and access content online are inescapably shaped by these logics of oppression — logics often deemed normal, normative and therefore “neutral” to those who benefit from them, even when they are anything but.

To make her case that we are living with a hegemonic culture of “algorithmic oppression” (4), Noble walks readers through a series of examples that follow out from a catalytic moment early in her graduate school career. She describes in chapter one putting the search string “black girls” into Google search in an effort to find activities for a group of preteen girls only to be inundated with a list of racist and hypersexualized results:

The best information, as listed by rank in the search results, was certainly not the best for me, or for the children I love. For whom, then, was this the best information and who decides? What were the profit and other motives driving this information to the top of the results? How had the notion of neutrality in information ranking and retrieval … remained so unexamined and without public critique? (18)

This first chapter walks readers through the basic concepts of algorithmic search and what can (and cannot) be gleaned about Google’s development of PageRank, its proprietary algorithmic product, from early concept documents. Based on the idea, borrowed from academia, that the most influential literature is also the most often cited, PageRank began with the assumption that a link to a web page was analogous to a citation, and that the web pages with the most links were therefore the most influential and therefore best (itself an assumption about power and authority that must be critically examined). While the algorithm itself may be proprietary, the fact that we cannot analyze the mechanism of Google search at the code level does not prevent us from observing — as Noble does — that Google’s algorithms produce search results that are anything but impartial. Not only does PageRank encourage searchers to engage with advertiser content — advertisers are, after all, Google’s primary clients — but also reproduce and amplify harmful beliefs.

Chapter two delves into specific examples of such searches, and casts a skeptical glance at the efforts of Google executives to distance their company from these harms. Searches including the word “Jew,” for example, produce a high proportion of anti-Semitic content (42); image searches for “doctor” return pictures of mostly white men, while image searches for “unprofessional hairstyles for work” produce pictures of black women (83). Whether or not Google software developers set out to create an algorithm that generates and amplifies the misogynoir[1] of our culture is beside the point. “Intent is not particularly important,” Noble reminds us (90). Whether or not a white person means to be racist (or a developer means to practice misogyny) is a question that may be unanswerable. Rather, as critical information workers and consumers, we must ask — regardless of intent — who is harmed by the images and ideas circulated through Google search interactions.

Having considered the technological processes and biased, arguably harmful results of the Google search product, Noble moves on in chapters three and four to consider other ways in which Google’s dominance in our online lives operates to further marginalize the already marginalized. As in the offline world, without purposeful and ongoing efforts to combat structural oppression in online spaces, inequality persists. Chapter three explores how the Internet, as a space governed by commercial interests rather than as a noncommercial public good, can cultivate and exacerbate harmful and false ideas. When the goal is to generate clicks for advertisers, there is little incentive for search products to “intercede in the framing of the question itself,” and challenge the searcher to critically examine their own desires or beliefs (116). Chapter four raises questions of data privacy and the right to be forgotten by an Internet that never forgets, particularly as increased visibility may deepen the vulnerability of already-vulnerable populations.[2]

algoirthms thread snipAfter reading the book and turning in my review, I had some further thoughts about the way sexually-explicit materials were handled within the text. A thread sharing those thoughts may be found on my Twitter timeline here. 

The final two chapters of Algorithms, along with a brief epilogue that considers the harrowing challenge of our current political moment, turn from the structural problem of algorithmic oppression toward potential solutions. One key intervention is to increase critical awareness of our digital ecosystem’s biases, a project that librarians and other information workers could be particularly well-positioned to undertake. Noble also champions a “public search engine alternative” to the current commercial options (152), a government-funded check on Google’s troubling power within and over almost every aspect of our interconnected lives and livelihoods. Even if that remedy seems politically unrealistic in the near future, it may be a public works project worth fighting for.

By focusing on the ubiquitous tool of Google search, Algorithms gives those just beginning to think critically about our Internet-centric information ecosystem concrete and replicable examples of algorithmic oppression in action. For those already steeped in the rapidly-growing literature of critical librarian and information studies, Algorithms will be a valuable addition to our corpus of texts that blend theory and practice, both documenting the problematic nature of where we are and the possibility of where we might arrive in future if we fight, collectively, to make it so.


[1] “Misogynoir” is a term coined by Moya Bailey to describe the particular misogyny that Black women experience, a misogyny inextricable from the racism they experience under white supremacy. See Moya Bailey, “They Aren’t Talking About Me,” Crunk Feminist Collective, 14 March 2010. http://www.crunkfeministcollective.com/2010/03/14/they-arent-talking-about-me/.

[2] The “right to be forgotten” is also a concept generating renewed interest in archives and cultural heritage study and practice; see for example Ashley Nicole Vavra, “The Right to Be Forgotten: An Archival Perspective.” The American Archivist vol. 81, no. 1 (Spring/Summer 2018): 100-111. https://doi.org/10.17723/0360-9081-81.1.100.

thirteen books

25 Wednesday Nov 2015

Posted by Anna Clutterbuck-Cook in book reviews

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

books

Bookshop in Old Aberdeen (2003)

Bookshop in Old Aberdeen, Scotland (2003)

According to GoodReads, I have thirteen books to read before the end of the year in order to make my (entirely self-imposed) goal of 104 books read in 2015. Below are the titles on my bookshelf that I plan (hope) to get to before the year is out.

Sexology and Translation: Cultural and Scientific Encounters Across the Modern World
edited by Heike Bauer

Born Bad: Original Sin and the Making of the Western World
by James Boyce

The Diabolical Miss Hyde (Electric Empire #1)
by Viola Carr

The Devious Miss Jekyll (Electric Empire #2)
by Viola Carr

Welcome to Night Vale
by Jeffrey Cranor and Joseph Fink

Progressive Evangelicals and the Pursuit of Social Justice
by Brantley W. Gasaway

Riotous Flesh: Women, Physiology, and the Solitary Vice in Nineteenth-Century America
by April Haynes

Queer London: Perils and Pleasures in the Sexual Metropolis, 1918-1957
by Matthew Houlbrook

Archives of Desire: The Queer Historical Work of New England Regionalism
J. Semaine Lockwood

Reflections (Indexing #2)
by Seanan McGuire

After the Wrath of God: AIDS, Sexuality, and American Religion
by Anthony Petro

The Shepherd’s Crown (Tiffany Aching #5)
by Terry Pratchett

Respectably Queer: Diversity Culture in LGBT Activist Organizations
by Jane Ward

What have you been / will you be reading in the final months of 2015?

booknotes: the sex myth

04 Tuesday Aug 2015

Posted by Anna Clutterbuck-Cook in book reviews

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

books, gender and sexuality

IMG_20150710_171202Rachel Hills’ The Sex Myth: The Gap Between Our Fantasies and Reality (Simon & Schuster, 2015) is released today in the U.S. I’ve had the privilege of watching this book grow into being on the Internet over the past half-dozen years and — full disclosure — in 2012 I became one of the over 200 interviewees whose stories form the backbone of Hills narrative. It was with some measure of bystander pride, therefore, that I cracked open the spine of my reviewers’ copy last month and sat down to read the final iteration of Hills’ research on the sexual cultures of our English-speaking world (primarily Australia, Britain, and the U.S.).

The Sex Myth is a book-length work of well-researched journalism, drawing from various disciplines — history, philosophy, psychology, sexology, sociology — as well as personal narratives gleaned from those one-to-one interviews to explicate what Hills refers to as The Sex Myth. Continue reading →

virtual book tour: best lesbian erotica 2015

23 Tuesday Jun 2015

Posted by Anna Clutterbuck-Cook in book reviews

≈ 2 Comments

Tags

sexuality, virtual book tours

Today I am hosting another Cleis Press virtual book tour, this time for their new anthology Best Lesbian Erotica 2015, edited by Laura Antoniou. A collection of twenty short stories by twenty-one different authors, this volume contains a refreshing variety of stories. Among my favorites were a tale of sexual flirtation told through an exchange of emails; the story of USO performer who seduces a WASP in the dressing room; a weaver who’s seduced by a Goddess; a lesbian elder narrating the beginnings of a long-term relationship to her lover; an arranged marriage to a queen; and a tattoo sitting that ends up entangled with sex. Having enjoyed the finished product, I was pleased to have the opportunity to interview the editor who had curated the collection. Without further ado, here is Laura Antoniou.

Best Lesbian Erotica 2015 cover imageOne of the things that really impressed me about Best Lesbian Erotica 2015 was the variety of stories. Too often, in my experience, erotica collections end up feeling very one-note. I think, often, it’s assumed that erotica readers are not very adventurous — that they’ll only read stories around sexual themes they themselves enjoy. But this volume has many different flavors and settings — including historical and fantastical. What was your thinking in bringing such disparate tales together?

Antoniou: Sometimes I do see a sad sort of sameness in genre entertainment, and lesbian erotica is nothing if not a very niche field. And publishing is a very conservative industry. Editors and publishers want exactly what sold well before – even as they wait for the next big hit to change the game. Add this to the fact that readers of erotica have a narrowly defined goal – to get aroused – and you have a formula for…formula. Two ladies meet. They engage in one sex act from column A and two from column B, leading to a sweet and wry ending after the explosive climax. Or multiple climax.

But in reality, lesbians aren’t this monolithic cookie-cutter production line of similarities. Gather ten of us in a room and you’ll have ten sets of turn-ons, turn-offs, experiences and desires and a range of fantasies that would make Nancy Friday blush. (I’m SO dating myself.) Our erotic literature should reflect that. And an anthology is the best way to do so; it allows for some stories to get immediately dog-eared (or bookmarked on a reading device?) and some to elicit fond or different kinds of thoughts and some that will be skipped over every time the reader pulls that book out. That’s freedom to me.

You write in your introduction that “one of the things I love about a sexy tale is an unmooring from reality.” That got me thinking about the pressure from some quarters that depictions of human sexuality be “realistic.” I get where that impulse is coming from, pushing back against performance anxieties around sexual intimacy and public health concerns. But we don’t demand that other genres — high fantasy, horror, poetry, fiction — be realistic. What do you think is lost with this demand that sexual fictions aspire to realism?

Antoniou: I never wanted my erotic fiction to have to stick to reality, whether in depictions of safer sex or physical capabilities for the same reason why I don’t demand my swords and sorcery or stalwart detective mysteries to adhere to objective reality. Fiction was not designed for truth. It is, in fact, more designed for what Stephen Colbert called “truthiness,” – a feeling that something could, or should be true, or is close enough to accept for your purposes. Erotica features characters who are super-model gorgeous, with the stamina of an Olympic athlete and responses a porn star would envy – and sure, that could be intimidating to we common humans. But erotica also contains sexy vampires and werewolves, impossible coincidences and magical things like the mind reading required for two strangers to get each other off exactly according to their desires. Or, despite them. If readers can accept magically perfect sex, then they can accept magically perfect sex with a goddess. A don’t know how different a Greek or African goddess is from that track-star, super-model, sexual dynamo, any way.

As someone who enjoys writing and reading erotic stories involving established relationships, I appreciated that you included some of those tales in 2015 and acknowledged them explicitly in your introduction. Why do you think erotica as a genre is so wedded to early relationship, “first time,” or hook-up encounter narratives?

Antoniou: First time narratives are awesome! They include joys we treasure. The mystery of this amazing person you’re going to be intimate with. The discovery process of flirtation or negotiation. Being surprised is wonderful. First time or stranger stories can include an element of doubt or danger, and the invention of a new connection. Of course they’re standard stories, especially in short form.

But to rely ONLY on first timers, or those elusive one-nighters means we ignore the steady and passionate strength of people who DO know each other well. Stories using characters who have already gone though the awkward or the sex-all-the-time honeymoon stages are more deliberate, and to me, more romantic. They show how knowing someone really does give one a sense of magical connection, that mind reading so unbelievable in a first time story. And I love how they show the scars and the ribbons from past experience. Sex with a long time lover isn’t as frantic or frightening as with a new one…unless, of course, that relationship came with more scars than ribbons. That’s how I could include the sweetest of stories about sexuality when your love is weak and ill, versus the hate-sex of people who really shouldn’t ever talk to each other because they just make things worse.

As an editor, what are one or two tropes in erotica you think have run their course?

Antoniou: I think we should have been over vampires even before Twilight, but whatevs, as they say. I’m also kind of over the expectations of butch = neanderthal and femme = fatale or selfish. I love me a good butch/femme dynamic, but some things are just old, not to mention hackneyed.

What are one or two things you’d like to see more of in the erotica you read?

Antoniou: Oh…gosh. Well. My personal taste differs from my editorial taste a great deal. Personally, I read the trashiest sort of things, and have no care for literary quality. But in general, I really would like to see more variety in setting. I love how I am seeing more queer romance set outside of the usual A) Big gay friendly city/gay neighborhood enclave of mostly white girls ready for a Netflix adaptation or B) small town girls getting it on in a setting that seems like it came out of a tourist brochure rather than genuine experience in such a setting. I’d like to see more than contemporary stories with contemporary language and mores. Different periods is a great place to hang out, especially if the author can evoke a time and place with just enough detail to let a reader feel like they could be there, too. I’d like to see some more fantastic settings, as in unreal, or completely alien, to challenge our own tropes and expectations. And I’d like to see more darkness, too. Erotic horror and dark fantasy, with edginess that makes a reader feel a little guilty for enjoying it? Oh, yeah, baby. That’s my kind of tale.

You can check out Best Lesbian Erotica 2015 at Cleis Press, your local bookshop or library, or one of the many online retailers. Find out more about Laura Antoniou’s work at lantoniou.com.

virtual book tour: the right side of history

09 Tuesday Jun 2015

Posted by Anna Clutterbuck-Cook in book reviews

≈ 2 Comments

Tags

history, sexuality, virtual book tours

rightsideselfieI’m giving a copy of The Right Side of History away! Check out the end of the post for details.

I recently finished a review of Lillian Faderman’s forthcoming The Gay Revolution: The Story of the Struggle (Simon & Schuster, 2015) for Library Journal. In that review, I observed that “if Revolution has a weakness it is a by-product of Faderman’s laudable ambition: big-picture narratives inevitably short-change individual stories.” The day after submitting my review, The Right Side of History: 100 Years if LGBTQI Activism, an anthology curated by Adrian Brooks (Cleis Press, 2015) arrived in the mail to address this shortcoming.

A “willfully cacophonous” collection of essays and interviews (as the forward by Jonathan Katz observes), The Right Side seeks the opposite of a coherent historical narrative. Instead, it offers us windows through which we can peer into queer lives past and consider under what circumstances our forebears lived. From Isadora Duncan and The Cradle Will Rock to an interview with Matthew Shephard’s mother and Sultan Shakir’s reflections on being “Black, Gay, and Muslim,” this anthology resists presenting us with a march toward a near future gay liberation. Instead, we are asked to consider the freedoms and constraints of individual lives; instead, we are confronted with LGBTQI individuals who may, or may not, be poster children of queer equality achieved. I appreciate the authors’s divergent voices, some first-person reflection and some more scholarly in tone — and I appreciate that queer activism is not always the primary focus of each piece. Instead, we see queer individuals involved in the struggle for racial justice or better labor conditions as well as their rights as specifically non-straight citizens.

The Right Side of History is not an original work of historical scholarship. The essays, when they aren’t first-person pieces or interviews, rely on secondary sources for most of their historical claims. However, as I was reading it I thought of myself as a twelve-year-old, and how I likely would have benefited enormously from having a copy of The Right Side pressed into my hands as a birthday or Christmas gift. I was the sort of child who voraciously read young peoples’ biographical sketches of inspiring women of history (some of whom I now know were decidedly queer). This collection would have helped me see possibilities for myself in a similar way as those women-of-history collections did — helped me find language and historical context for longings I was just beginning to form. I suggest you consider this book for the queer, questioning, and just plain historically interested teenagers in your life; it’s never too early to start peering through the windows of the past and considering how and where you might fit yourself.

GIVEAWAY!

Cleis Press has generously offered one free copy of The Right Side of History to readers of this review. If you would like to put your name in the hat, please comment (here on this review) or Tweet (to me @feministlib) sharing the name of an individual or an event that you feel is under-recognized in queer history. If you had been tasked with writing a chapter for Brooks’ anthology, whom or what would you have chosen to write about? Deadline for entries is 5pm Friday 6/12 and I will contact the winner* on Monday 6/15 to obtain a mailing address.**

*I will use an online randomizer to select one out of all valid entries.
**Cleis Press will only mail to a U.S. address.

booknotes: three of hearts

28 Tuesday Apr 2015

Posted by Anna Clutterbuck-Cook in book reviews

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

sexuality, virtual book tours

Welcome to today’s stop on the virtual book tour for Three of Hearts: Erotic Romance for Women, a new collection of short stories edited by Kristina Wright for Cleis Press (2015). As the title and cover art suggest, Three of Hearts is an anthology about threesomes – so let’s talk about the complexity of writing poly porn!

I was invited to participate in the book tour for Three shortly after diving into my own first-ever pass at writing an “OT3” — the fan fiction world equivalent of erotic, romantic threesomes — so I thought, hey! maybe I’ll get some ideas. If only about what not to do — because, to be honest, I struggle to connect with a lot of original (non fanwork) erotica. As it turns out, I have some positive as well as frustrated things to say — so congratulations to the editor and authors on that score!

In terms of Three‘s positives, I was particularly impressed by the relative diversity of situations and perspectives contained within this single collection. Continue reading →

virtual book tour: ultimate guide to sex after fifty

02 Monday Feb 2015

Posted by Anna Clutterbuck-Cook in book reviews

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

gender and sexuality, sexuality, virtual book tours

Today, I am participating in the virtual book tour for Joan Price’s The Ultimate Guide to Sex After 50 (Cleis Press, 2015).

Price, author of the book Naked at Our Age: Talking Out Loud About Senior Sex (Seal Press, 2011) returns to book format with a compilation of advice and information drawn from her extensive web presence and experience educating others about the joys of life-long sexual pleasure. The eighteen chapters are thematically organized around such topics as “Sex With Yourself and Toys,” “You and Your Doctor,” and “Cancer, Cancer Treatment, and Sex”; each chapter has a brief narrative interspersed with anonymous quotations drawn from Price’s online discussions and breakout sections with advice from experts, case studies, and further resources. The back of the book provides a brief recommended resource section, though some of the subsections of the bibliography are sparse and the selection criteria is unclear — could she really only find one recommend resource on the subject of body image, for example? And no trans- or gay male specific sexuality resources under the LGBT heading?

My reader’s response to The Ultimate Guide was mixed. Setting my age aside for the moment, I did not feel like I was the target audience for this book. My crunchy granola queer feminist sex nerd attitude toward human sexuality was unevenly represented within its pages. I agree with Price’s premise that we must counteract our youth-centric culture with targeted sex-positive resources for those whose bodies and experiences are not shaped, for example, by the college relationship scene or decisions about whether or not to procreate (and how). Yet I remain unconvinced that The Ultimate Guide (or its like-minded successor) will be my resource of choice in thirty, forty years’ time.

Continue reading →

subject/verdict: stuff I’ve been reading in two-sentence reviews [no. 7]

26 Monday Jan 2015

Posted by Anna Clutterbuck-Cook in book reviews

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

subject verdict

I’ve been reading a number of good books for review lately (see list at the end of this post) that I can’t write about here, but have also enjoyed a great deal of genre fiction recently so I thought I’d share a few titles with y’all.

Cross, Kady. The Girl in the Steel Corset (Harlequin Teen, 2011). I’ve been enjoying works under Cross’ various pseudonyms (see also: Kate Cross, Kate Locke) but I think this series of YA adventures set in the same steampunk universe as her Kate Cross novels may be my favorite. Here we follow a merry band of teenage misfits (again, no identified queers, alas) with mutant powers as they wrestle with romance, politics, and the eternal adolescent questions of where they come from and where their place in the larger world might be.

Gleason, Colleen. The Clockwork Scarab (Chronicle, 2013). First installment in a steampunk YA series featuring Miss Mina Holmes (daughter of Mycroft, consulting detective) and Miss Evaline Stoker (sister of Bram, vampire hunter) in a steam-powered alternate London, the plot of Clockwork turns on an Egyptology club somehow involved in the murder of several society girls in apparent suicide. Delightfully fast-paced fun with a high degree of sexual tension between the two heroines I hopewish — though don’t expect — the author will follow through upon.

Holmberg, Charlie. The Paper Magician (47North, 2014). A quiet little magician-in-training story with disquieting undertones, Paper Magician introduces us to a world in which individual magic is channeled through specific substances: paper, metal, glass. We follow the coming-of-age (and romantic) adventures of Ceony Twill and her troubled mentor Emery Thane as they are forced to confront malevolent magicians from Thane’s past.

Joyce, Graham. Some Kind of Fairy Tale (Doubleday, 2012). A haunting stolen child narrative set in rural England, Joyce’s novel turns on the reappearance of Tara one the doorstep of her childhood home twenty years after she vanished — but no older, and with an outlandish story about a stranger on a horse and a wild, libertine land. While the novel is beautifully and compellingly written, overall I was disappointed in the way Some Kind of Fairy Tale turned on Tara’s manic pixie dream girl status: She becomes the catalyst for change (good or ill) in the lives of half a dozen men, but remains herself a martyred cipher.

Lafferty, Mur. The Shambling Guide to New York City (Orbit, 2013). On our inaugural visit to PapercutsJP — the new neighborhood bookshop — Hanna bought me this lighthearted story about an intrepid travel writer on the rebound who stumbles into an unlikely opportunity: editing travel guides for monsters the coterie. Lafferty has followed her first book up with a sequel set in New Orleans and has hinted at a third set in Boston — sign me up!

Mantchev, Lisa. Ticker (Skyscape, 2014). A young woman with a heart defect saved by a surgeon who implants a clockwork “ticker” in her chest; the surgeon now on trial for murderously unethical practices; an infernal device gone off in the family factory; Penny Farthing’s brilliant parents gone missing — the events and players are all connected, but can Penny unravel the intrigue before it’s too late? A rare genre novel that isn’t blatantly sequel-hunting, Ticker is an excellent one-off from the author of the Theatre Illuminata series.

Reviewing Elsewhere This Spring

Ahmed, Sara. On Being Included: Racism and Diversity in Institutional Life (Duke University Press, 2012). ~ NEA News

Hartman, Andrew. The War for the Soul of America: A History of the Culture Wars (Univ. of Chicago Press, 2015). ~ Library Journal

Yoshino, Kenji. Speak Now: Marriage Equality on Trial (Crown, 2015) ~ Library Journal

subject/verdict: stuff I’ve been reading in two-sentence reviews [no. 6]

06 Saturday Dec 2014

Posted by Anna Clutterbuck-Cook in book reviews

≈ Leave a comment

As you may have noticed, I’ve backed off the book review posts this fall — in part because I’ve taken on too much elsewhere and partly because I wanted to reclaim the pleasure of reading just because rather than worrying about how to shape thoughts for a review.

But it’s a dreary Saturday here in Jamaica Plain and I’ve read some interesting books lately, so I thought I’d pull together a subject/verdict post for y’all. Offered up in order read.

Stevens, Mitchell. Culture and Controversy in the Homeschooling Movement (Princeton Univ. Press, 2001). Stevens conducted an ethnographic study of modern home education practices during the 1990s – just at the point when secular counterculture practitioners were giving way in numbers to the evangelical Christian homeschool tidal wave. Though an outside, Stevens’ exploration of the movement’s cultural mores is nuanced and thought-provoking; I would have liked to see more in-depth attention to the gender work secular and religious families perform to justify their life paths.

Citron, Danielle Keats. Hate Crimes in Cyberspace (Harvard Univ. Press, 2014). Keats, a lawyer specializing in ‘net-based harassment and violence against women, has written an excellent primer on the nature and consequences of online misogyny and some possible legal avenues for addressing the situation. The situations she outlines will be familiar to most of us guilty of blogging while female, and her solutions are a thoughtful mix of practical short-term application of existing laws plus suggestions for long-term legal reform.

Lois, Jennifer. Home Is Where the School Is (New York Univ. Press, 2013). Another sociological exploration of home education, researcher Jennifer Lois conducted an ethnographic study of homeschooling mothers in western Washington in the early 2000s. Her study reflects the dominant Christian-based home education culture found in her sample, yet nevertheless has some insightful things to say about the work of caregiving and shifting ideologies of gender within homeschooling cultures. Continue reading →

← Older posts
"the past is a wild party; check your preconceptions at the door." ~ Emma Donoghue

Recent Posts

  • medical update 11.11.22
  • medical update 6.4.22
  • medical update 1.16.2022
  • medical update 10.13.2021
  • medical update 8.17.2021

Archives

Categories

Creative Commons License

This work by Anna J. Clutterbuck-Cook is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License

Meta

  • Register
  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.com

Blog at WordPress.com.

  • Follow Following
    • the feminist librarian
    • Join 37 other followers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • the feminist librarian
    • Customize
    • Follow Following
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
 

Loading Comments...